Show HN: DoubleMemory – more efficient local-first read-it-later app

doublememory.com

119 points by randomor 13 hours ago

DoubleMemory started as an experiment to see if I can somehow automatically save all double cmd + c, as I often do instinctively, so I don't need extensions to save links and text into an app, and avoiding flooding the capture history as regular clipboard managers does.

My motivation was not to create a read-it-later app, yet it evolved into this unique yet cohesive form of a read-it-later + bookmarking organizer + clipboard manager + card based note-taking app over the last 6 months. It also launches from the menu bar with a shortcut and navigates with keyboard shortcuts. My favorite part is instead of rendering a list of article titles, everything is rendered as pretty preview cards in a translucent Pinterest-like mood board. It also has a nifty iOS app, that will allow you to swipe with your thumbs between articles just like on iOS Safari...

Now that Pocket is closing, this is after Instapaper going back to indie and Omnivore and UpNext and numerous others closing over the years. All of these are cloud-hosted services, which got me reflecting: maybe this local-first architecture would be well positioned to build in this space.

Here is my not-so-scientific comparison:

## Domain

$10 vs $1M = 100,000x difference.

## Server running cost

No servers other than what's running by iCloud vs $1M per year = 1mX difference

## Platforms

Apple only (mac + iphone + ipad) vs Multi platforms (windows, linux, android also supported) = 20X maintenance cost difference

## Capturing

No browser extensions required v.s. maintain all extensions for various browsers and extension stores = 5x difference

## Architecture

App receives the link, Apple generates the rich preview cards for thousands of different types of links, app caches these preview cards. vs. Someone write some custom code for each link type or with Open Graph, one designer created one generic card that works for all links. = 100x cost difference.

I know, Apple is coming for clipboards with more restrictions, which is basically a shared global state on Mac systems, DoubleMemory does also support other ways to capture: drag-n-drop to app/menubar icon/app icon, right click->Services menu, or Share sheet. We will add more auto-importers.

Also vibe coded some importers for Pocket, Omnivore and ReadWise here: https://doublememory.com/posts/tools

Everything in the app is free with no limits. Capturing is really step 0. You giving us a chance to save your content, doesn't mean you are getting any values out of it (ain't that the typical story of read-it-later apps? save-it and never-read-it). the eventual goal is to easily retrieve these content, and eventually consuming them. I hope to eventually launch paid features that aligns with these value generating workflows.

App Store link: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/doublememory/id6737529034

Let me know what you think...

allenu 10 hours ago

Looks like a really interesting idea here! Congrats on shipping. I just downloaded it to play around with. The screenshots are well done and make the app feel like something exciting to try out.

I would work on trying to simplifying the landing page copy, though. The "Stress-Free Bookmarking, Read-it-later, and Clipboard..." text is super long and most people aren't going to read the entire thing. I would try to emphasize what the benefit is to the user somehow. Something like "Save everything easily". That's terrible copy, too, but you get the idea. The "Super Memory Activated" and "doublememory.com" made me think at first that this is improving my computer's memory usage.

After skimming the page, I kind of got the idea about what the product does, but I think you can make it even simpler to grok right away what it does with a few tweaks. Best of luck!

Edit: one thing I noticed is I can do shift-cmd-spacebar to bring it up, but the search text field doesn't automatically get focus. That's a little bit of friction. If I do cmd-F to search, it toggles the filter UI, which was unexpected. I wanted to cmd-F to move the focus into the search to start typing.

  • randomor 9 hours ago

    That's gold. Thank you! Yes the refocusing can be unreliable. Currently the more reliable way is press tab to refocus. I'll work on the landing page, as that hasn't been updated for months and it's slightly outdated and didn't even highlight the now available iOS app.

kstrauser 12 hours ago

That looks pretty neat! I haven't played around with it yet, but here's some preliminary feedback:

* "⌘ + C + C", to me, means "press cmd-C, then press C". It look me a minute to release it means "press cmd-C twice".

* Thank you for using iCloud sync!

* Your privacy policy says "The developer does not collect any data from this app.". Thank you!

* The pricing feels high to me. I'm mentally comparing it to PastePal (clipboard manager, one-time $15 payment) plus GoodLinks (bookmarks manager, $5 per year to buy upgrades, but you can use it forever for free). I know it's not an exact comparison, but as someone who might really like your app, that's how I personally think of it.

  • alkh 11 hours ago

    Agree with with everything, if there was a way to use something besides icloud that would be very appreciated. I have nothing against it but the more options there are, the better.

    • randomor 11 hours ago

      True. More options and more controls always better, just need to balance priorities. What specific sync options are you thinking?

  • randomor 11 hours ago

    Thanks for these feedback. I'll take note.

    About the pricing, I just realized my introduction pricing has expired last night. I just created one again for $9.99 for the first year. However, I'm definitely exploring pricing, but as I mentioned right now the sub is simply a way for me to gather signal for interests, no features are behind paywalls, you only benefit of subbing right now is lock-in the early price and remove the sub button. I'll be working on real value generating features in the future.

    Long term, I'm hoping to implement fair and incremental upgrades, it just takes more setup.... My current pricing is kinda anchored with ReadWise & Paste, which are 200% more than what I charge. I'm also guessing many people are looking for a lifetime purchase, I'll definitely work on that at some point, people who've subscribed will be able to redeem it directly with me once that's available.

    • kebokyo 9 hours ago

      What kind of “value-generating” features are you thinking of?

      One big comment I want to give on that front is, if you decide to try any generative AI features, please please please make them *completely opt-in* and integrate with *local models* (either completely or as an alternative to cloud models like GPT / Claude / etc). If I can use your software happily without being bombarded with ads for AI features and can use those AI features how I want to instead of how would best make you money, I would appreciate that so much.

      • randomor 8 hours ago

        You got it. Yes, AI will be a good piece of the puzzle. Local models is exactly what I prefer, if you haven't notice, that's a big principle of this app. I'm really hoping Apple can step in and offer a local model so I don't have to download one big blob. Supporting Ollama sounds cool but I feel like that's a big barrier for many... BYOK also nice, but at that point why not just build a MCP interface instead of building another flavor of AI chat? Otherwise I'm thinking about embedding all items so it's easier to: auto-generate tags, cluster by topics etc...

        • asadm 7 hours ago

          as initial step, just do some “rag” / vector db thing ie. no llm. see chrome’s embedded model and how it works.

    • kstrauser 8 hours ago

      That makes a lot of sense. And I’m not saying your current pricing is wrong. I’m just some rando. What do I know?

      I’d definitely prefer a lifetime purchase, or even an option to pay to unlock new features for the next year and then keep those features forever, like GoodLinks does. I’m a huge fan of that pricing model.

      • randomor 8 hours ago

        Of course, I appreciate your perspective and am constantly collecting data points. I'll get to the pricing model experiments. Now that Apple is opening up third party payment, maybe I'll finally looking into third party subscription SDKs...

butz an hour ago

My problem with all "read later" tools is that I like to stash interesting articles, but rarely actually read them. Same with bookmarks.

raydenvm 2 hours ago

Beautiful one! I have been a fan of hotkeys since childhood. How did you decide to choose "Cmd + C" twice? Were there other competing options that might be quicker and not in conflict with other hotkeys?

  • randomor 2 hours ago

    well, it's not me choosing it, i'm just tapping into the system clipboard. If you right click and copy something twice it will also be auto saved. I do this instinctively previously so one day I thought can I actually use this as a signal to REALLY remember something...

stevelacy 5 hours ago

Very nice looking app, installed. Would be interesting if this integrated with Raycast.

I would suggest hiding the main window from the dock/switcher as when the window is closed it still presents the app title. Potentially NSApplication.setActivationPolicy(.accessory)

  • randomor 5 hours ago

    good eye, i'll try play with that setting. Raycast does already have bookmarking features, but when if enough people make this request, i'll look into it. Or maybe expose some MCP interface so it can interact with this.

mnming 4 hours ago

With pocket sunsetting, I have been searching for alternatives lately. After a few rounds of search, I can't convince myself to use specialized bookmarks tool over Notion / Obsidian. I wonder what other people feel?

  • JimDabell 2 hours ago

    I’ve tried using Notion for this and I really can’t stand it. There’s a long-standing bug in Notion where if you paste a link in, the focus gets captured by the bookmark and cannot be moved by keyboard. You have to switch to the mouse to click away from the bookmark before you can continue typing. That alone is a show-stopper for me. What kind of document editor forces you to use the mouse?

    Beyond that, I don’t think there’s any way of conveniently pasting in a URL as a bookmark. Is the only option to paste the link, then arrow down to “Bookmark” in the popup menu that appears and hit enter? There’s no option to just default to bookmark?

G1N 11 hours ago

This is a really cool app! I wish you would also put your pricing information on the website (as far as I can tell the only way to discover this without downloading the app is by looking at the in-app purchases section on the App Store listing, apologies if I missed it on the website)

  • randomor 11 hours ago

    I'll take note, i'll add a pricing section and Q&A section soon. Thanks for the feedback. If you are a student, feel free to ping for a promo code.

awaseem 9 hours ago

Wow I was just building something like this haha. This seems awesome, is it free? I can’t tell from the site

  • hnhn34 8 hours ago

    Same! I guess HNers have the same tendency to hoard bookmarks so we all ran into the same pain points.

    • randomor 8 hours ago

      Many of us certainly do share these pain points, most people will lament of a closing read-it-later tool and think "if only it's open source" so they can self-host a tool that likes pocket or omnivore, thinking that's the final form of this category. Nothing wrong with that, that's a tried and proven paradigm and comes with no additional transition cost.

      Because i started this not intending to build a read-it-later tool, we are working on different foundations with building blocks... we'll see where this digression will take me...

  • randomor 9 hours ago

    it's free as long as you don't get distracted by the subscribe button, no feature limitations, just a bit of distractions.

Jotalea 6 hours ago

I believe this is so useful it should be implemented in macOS itself. Maybe not the same way as here, but having a keybind to "save stuff for later" is really useful.

But I'm not gonna lie, I was a little bit disappointed when I saw it was exclusive to Apple systems. I guess I'll have to build it myself for using on Arch Linux (and Android). Well, at the end of the day Arch is a DIY OS ;)

  • randomor 2 hours ago

    i agree. Tim, waiting for your call here. you can find my number when you deposit the $10 i made this month.

randomor 13 hours ago

I'll be available here if you have questions.

asadm 7 hours ago

would be cool if you offered a one-time fee (like $30). many people including me are tired of subscription

  • randomor 6 hours ago

    noted. thanks for providing another data point!

loremm 12 hours ago

would love support for linux, even if it required hacks or was not as seamless

  • randomor 12 hours ago

    I’d love to do that one day. Right now trying to find out if it’s interesting enough for 1% of Apple users to turn their heads.

jonator 10 hours ago

Does it have an MCP server?

  • randomor 9 hours ago

    definitely want to get there soon, right now the most requested related features are apple shortcuts. Hopefully with the growing MCP ecosystem it will be a sweet MCP setup as we don't need a server or a node process.

mdonahoe 11 hours ago

Copycopy?

  • randomor 11 hours ago

    Is that a nickname? :D

    Yes the magic command is copy twice within 5 seconds. It can be cmd + C via keyboard or context menu copy, anything updates your clipboard twice with identical content will be triggering it. You can always disable it conflicts with other workflows or apps.